Wednesday, 25 September 2013

Rethinking Education Policy in Quebec


Public education in Quebec has recently come under fresh attack by the Government, in the current instance for imposing significant tax increases on citizens in response to reductions in government funding. As frequently is the case the criticism is leveled at school boards and their elected commissioners. Demands are being made not merely for school boards to roll back or otherwise palliate the impact of tax increases already budgeted, but for solutions to be found within a matter of days.  Those demands reflect a profound lack of understanding on the part of the government of public education in general and of the functioning of school boards. School commissioners are being asked to cut administrative expenses, as if administration contributes nothing to the value or quality of education. That is far from the case. The demand is that budgets be compressed without reducing services to students as if school boards spend money on anything that does not serve students. No solution to this dilemma will be easy and decidedly no short-term solution exists.

Public commentary, whether by government, the media or irate taxpayers and parents ignores much of what is happening in education. Public schools grapple with constantly increasing demands for better performance, coupled with large new mandates that are often either unfunded or inadequately funded. One of the most  school property, but also virtually on social media anytime and anywhere. It is merely the latest of unrealistic burdens imposed on an already overburdened system. Schools must not only teach, but socialize, discipline and inspire students. Incredibly education has risen to the challenge and is succeeding beyond realistic expectation.

Media joyously report our misdeeds and shortcomings while governments complain that we consume too large a share of public expenditures. Media occasionally mention that education is important for future prosperity and trot out clichés like the mantra ‘education is the surest path out of poverty’. Then they proceed to treat education costs as expenses rather than investments in the future. They seldom mention that the Canadian and Quebec education systems rank among the best in the world, well ahead of the customary comparisons with United States, Britain, France and other leading developed countries. For consumers of much media reporting it seems that public education is hopelessly ineffective and inadequate. In fact our education system is being revolutionized thanks to the tireless dedication of teachers, professionals and administrators who implement change and the work of elected commissioners who challenge tradition and ensure that higher expectations are met.

The revolution now underway in education is so profound that lifelong educators struggle to understand it. Even more so, reporters and commentators in the media have difficulty grasping the direction, the depth and purpose of many changes they observe and the many more that occur unnoticed. Ultimately, politicians and government, preoccupied as they are with so many complex issues, can hardly be faulted for superficial assessments and simplistic approaches to meeting society’s educational needs. The ultimate question is seldom asked. It should be, “what kind of education system to you want?”

The purpose of education is seldom if ever clearly stated. That may be due to the different points of view. Parents want their children to be equipped for a successful life, but success is defined differently by most. Taxpayers want students prepared to become productive citizens, contributing to general prosperity and ensuring resources will be available to support retirees in comfort. Employers in both public and private spheres want employees fully equipped with the knowledge, skills and work ethic to perform the available jobs and ready to be retrained as required to keep pace with developing technology. Colleges and universities often seem to want students with study skills and aptitudes for esoteric thought, philosophical reflection and detached observation of humankind. Governments wish for successive generations of citizens who place the collective benefit, whether of concern for the environmental, preservation of heritage or participation in democratic processes ahead of individual and personal interests. What kind of education system to they want?

Society is changing at a pace never before seen. The explosion of knowledge, its ubiquitous availability, and the rapid appearance of whole new industries has made career planning extremely challenging. Not long ago, steel workers in Hamilton and auto assemblers in Oshawa and Mirabel were among the best paid most securely employed and pensioned workers in Canada. Now those plants are closed or sadly reduced, with tens of thousands of people required to find new jobs and work outside their fields. It isn’t only the rust belt industries that suffer traumatic changes. Ask former employees of once high-flying Nortel, Canada’s tech darling, or in the news currently, the 5,000 workers at Blackberry (Research in Motion) facing layoffs whether the crisis is due to old-style industries. Change is the new normal and education needs to change with it. Once again education is not given credit for what it is accomplishing.

Education is in the midst of a three-phase revolution that responds to external changes and tries to satisfy many of the evolving demands placed upon it. This revolution is apparent mainly to those inside the field. It began with the first availability of affordable personal computers in the 1990s and really got underway at the beginning of this century, after most current students were born. It has caused great stress and angst among educators with heated debates continuing to this day over which if any of the changes is appropriate or desirable. Progress is uneven but here is a general outline of what is happening in education.

The first phase of the revolution is changing the emphasis on student learning. Most of today’s parents were educated focusing on lower-level intellectual tasks (factual recall, regurgitation). That satisfied the needs of society at the time and we still hear appeals for a return to rote learning and the three Rs.  Modern society requires students more often engaging in tasks of greater cognitive complexity such as creativity, critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration and effective communication. Practices and habits die hard, and often teachers and parents resist the change because it feels so unfamiliar and seems so far outside their comfort zone. However education continues to evolve in this direction because the world of work and play in the future requires higher order thinking skills for success.

The second element of the revolution in education is changing classrooms from analog to digital so that they more closely resemble the world outside school. We inherited classrooms largely based on pens/pencils, paper, notebooks, ring binders and printed textbooks. Starting fifteen or twenty years ago we introduced digital tools in a naïve way simply placing computers in classrooms and hoping they would inspire change. When that didn’t produce results we became more realistic and began retraining teachers, along with giving students their own computers and open connectivity. Our goal is to change classrooms into local and global learning spaces that are deeply and richly technology infused. It involves teachers and other educators to completely transform what and how they teach.

The third phase of the revolution is the most challenging because it is so alien to traditional thinking. We are changing learning from teacher-directed to student-directed. Educators are often reluctant to give up control of classrooms and offer students more input. However the trend is toward learning environments that enable greater student ownership and control of what, how, when, where, who with and why they learn. Many professional educators don’t yet fully comprehend anytime anywhere learning or the implications of constant connectivity, ubiquitous information access or peer assessment. It requires student support and understanding to smooth the path in a way that does not threaten the authority or contribution of teachers.

With so much profound change underway, and so little understanding in the public sphere it is not surprising that unwarranted criticisms are plentiful. There are no easy solutions and no instantaneous ones. We are dealing with the welfare of our future generations, and we need to act both only responsibly and inventively. We are also responsible for the livelihoods of the thousands of committed educators who have security of employment, collectively negotiated rights and a key role in student development to fill. Everyone wants the best possible outcomes even when they can’t always agree on what those outcomes should be. However creating and maintaining a high-performing education system while respecting limits on resources goes far beyond simple budget manipulations. It takes time and innovation to restructure an entire system. It takes thinking about how to accomplish goals in ways that are not only different from the past, but far more efficient. We have to give up tradition and some degree of comfort to venture into the scary future. That revolution is underway but like anything worthwhile it takes time to achieve. Aborting it by applying short-term thinking to generational issues can only end badly.